Protection to Foreign Trademarks
This isn't really Indian Law, but...
In the case of ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc, it was claimed that the trademark of Bukhara restaurant in New Delhi was being infringed by a restaurant name Bukhara Grill which had been opened in New York. [1] Sheppard Mullin says, “The New York State Court of Appeals concluded that while the “famous marks doctrine” itself is not recognized by New York law, New York law does provide protection to the owner of a famous mark by virtue of the owner’s prior use of the mark in a foreign country under a theory of unfair competition through misappropriation.” [2]
However, Thomas Zuber points out that ‘according to the Second Circuit’s recent ruling in ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc., No. 05-0933-cv, 2007 WL 914742 (2d Cir. March 28, 2007), there is no federal “famous marks” exception to the basic territoriality rule that the United States does not enforce trademark rights that exist only under foreign law’.(The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Grupo Gigante S.A. de C.V. v. Dallo & Co., Inc., 391 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 2004) had earlier recognized the famous foreign trademark exception to territoriality).
Links:
[1] www.nycourts.gov/courts/appeals/decisions/dec07/165opn07.pdf
[2] www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/archives/trademarks-and-trade-dress-court-finds-famous-foreign-trademarks-protectible.html
[3]www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysnative/RDpcT3BpbnNcT1BOXDA1LTA5MzMtY3Zfb3BuLnBkZg==/05-0933-cv_opn.pdf www.aipla.org/Content/ContentGroups/Issues_and_Advocacy/Amicus_Briefs1/20079/ITCbrief_Final_Revised2.pdf
[4] www.lawupdates.com/commentary/itc_ltd_v_punchgini_inc
[5] www.law.cornell.edu/nyctap/I07_0164.htm
In the case of ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc, it was claimed that the trademark of Bukhara restaurant in New Delhi was being infringed by a restaurant name Bukhara Grill which had been opened in New York. [1] Sheppard Mullin says, “The New York State Court of Appeals concluded that while the “famous marks doctrine” itself is not recognized by New York law, New York law does provide protection to the owner of a famous mark by virtue of the owner’s prior use of the mark in a foreign country under a theory of unfair competition through misappropriation.” [2]
However, Thomas Zuber points out that ‘according to the Second Circuit’s recent ruling in ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc., No. 05-0933-cv, 2007 WL 914742 (2d Cir. March 28, 2007), there is no federal “famous marks” exception to the basic territoriality rule that the United States does not enforce trademark rights that exist only under foreign law’.(The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Grupo Gigante S.A. de C.V. v. Dallo & Co., Inc., 391 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 2004) had earlier recognized the famous foreign trademark exception to territoriality).
Links:
[1] www.nycourts.gov/courts/appeals/decisions/dec07/165opn07.pdf
[2] www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/archives/trademarks-and-trade-dress-court-finds-famous-foreign-trademarks-protectible.html
[3]www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysnative/RDpcT3BpbnNcT1BOXDA1LTA5MzMtY3Zfb3BuLnBkZg==/05-0933-cv_opn.pdf www.aipla.org/Content/ContentGroups/Issues_and_Advocacy/Amicus_Briefs1/20079/ITCbrief_Final_Revised2.pdf
[4] www.lawupdates.com/commentary/itc_ltd_v_punchgini_inc
[5] www.law.cornell.edu/nyctap/I07_0164.htm
Labels: Foreign Law, Intellectual Property, Trademarks
<< Home